GVGK Tang
  • Home
  • CV
  • Research
  • Contact

Civil Liberty/Disobedience & Free Love

2/28/2016

2 Comments

 
   "I had asked for the transfer in order to get outdoor farm work.  It is a relief from
   the months indoors with pots and pans [...] The time has passed with unexpected
   rapidity – due to the loss of time-sense in the busy routine of institutional life."


I've only come across one other letter from an imprisoned conscientious objector so far.  A quick and easy Google search told me this one was from the Roger Nash Baldwin – co-founder of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in 1920.  He wrote his friends (presumably HWLD among them) on May 26, 1919 to inform them that he had been transferred from the Essex County Jail in Newark to the Essex County Penitentiary in Caldwell, New Jersey, twelve miles away.  Baldwin remarks on the rigidity of the day's routine, the beautiful scenery, and the fact that his not-so-harsh environment is more of a "county work-farm for short-term offenders" than a "penitentiary."

Baldwin's 1981 obituary confirms that he was jailed for his pacifist ideology and refusal to submit to the draft.  He eventually oversaw the ACLU's defense in the Scopes trial and Sacco-Vanzetti case.  This information is significant but cursory – qualifying more as the stuff of "fun facts" than any in-depth analysis.  So, I opted to make Baldwin a miniature case study of pacifism and queerness.  Hopefully, by investigating his take on civil liberties and sexuality, I could find connections to HWLD's own life.
Picture
Roger Nash Baldwin. American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties. Accessed February 27, 2016. https://www.aclusandiego.org/founding-of-the-aclu-1920s.

In doing so, I came across a great read, Leigh Ann Wheeler's How Sex Became a Civil Liberty.  From it, one may glean two interesting points about Baldwin's sentiments on sexuality:
  • Baldwin's attitude toward the state was partly radicalized by Emma Goldman – a notorious anarchist and leader of the Free Speech League.  While he had always considered the state a means of achieving social reform, she considered it a "tool of coercion and repression – an entity that persecuted its opponents, repressed labor, prohibited birth control, and punished sexual nonconformists" [Chapter 1].  Baldwin grew enamored of Goldman and her free love agenda and more disillusioned with democracy.
  • "Baldwin was not alone; many men who helped lead the ACLU or were involved with female ACLU leaders imported their ideals about individual freedom into their sexual and romantic relationships and did so frankly.  In many ways, their private lives became laboratories for experimenting with sexual civil liberties"  [Chapter 1].

Further, Wheeler goes on to describe women's rights activist Harriet Pilpel and her proposal at a 1964 ACLU conference to "protect all private sexual behavior between consenting adults" [page Ixvi].  Baldwin argued that this definition was too narrow and failed to "recognize the unique problems faced by 'bi-sexuals,' especially married fathers charged with committing a homosexual act" [page Ixvi].

Indeed, privacy itself was a contested topic within the sphere of sexual civil liberties.  According to Robert Cottrell, in his book Roger Nash Baldwin and the American Civil Liberties Union, Baldwin contended that "Private sexual life should be private, not in public places.  You don't have public fornication or public homosexuality.  Some things you don't do in public view.  The Puritan ethic had something to be said for it" (166).

So, my questions are:  How might a man like Roger Nash Baldwin have reconciled his views on civil liberties, civil disobedience, and sexual nonconformity – heterosexual free love versus homosexuality?  Was he aware that a number of people in his own movement (like HWLD) were homosexual?  How would he feel about the tool of civil disobedience used in movements for sexual liberation and modern LGBT rights in parallel to its use in pacifist protest?
Picture
Box 1 [Reel 71.1] Folder 1, Page 147: Correspondence from Roger Baldwin,
in the Henry Wadsworth Longfellow Dana Papers (DG 011), Swarthmore College Peace Collection.

2 Comments

The Missing Link?

9/19/2015

0 Comments

 
     "[...] I regret for many reasons seeing pacifism and anarchism so closely associated in the popular mind.
     Can we not guide our young enthusiasts, whose sincerity I appreciate and value, into wiser associations and lines of conduct?"


I've recently come to learn that anarchist writers helped defend and promote the hybrid notion of leftist sexuality in the United States — a fact upon which I've built my thesis.  With that in mind, I find irony in the fact that Dana — a gay man with socialist and pacifist affiliations — received a letter from Virginia Gildersleeve — the Dean of Barnard College, who was herself quite radical in her own right — about a student's controversial affiliations (please see next post).

As a point of curiosity, then, how is it that socialism and anarchism have both historically found affiliations with pacifism?  Was this a general lumping of all subversive ideology, or could pacifism somehow be conceived of as a bridge between the two political philosophies?

Is pacifism a part of some larger missing link that would help explain the way "third sex" socialists in Europe corresponded with American anarchists?  Or was the only thing the two activist groups had in common their investment in free love and sexual liberation — and with it, an interest in a peaceable (perhaps Utopian) society that would allow it?

In connection to my last post, it seems there was a divide between conscientious objectors who still followed the rule of law and those who practiced civil disobedience (perhaps sullying the law-abiding image of the pacifist movement that the former worked to maintain).
Box 1 [Reel 71.1] Folder 1, Pages 37a-b: Correspondence from Virginia C. Gildersleeve of Barnard College,
in the Henry Wadsworth Longfellow Dana Papers (DG 011), Swarthmore College Peace Collection.

0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015

    Categories

    All
    Accessibility
    Anarchism
    Archives & Manuscripts
    Articles
    Books
    Colonialism
    Conflict Theory
    Conservation
    Correspondence
    Digital History
    Digital Technologies
    Feminism
    Films
    Gender
    Historiography
    HWLD
    Imperialism
    Interpretation
    Karl Heinrich Ulrichs
    Managing History
    Outreach
    Pacifism
    Periodicals
    Photos
    Pornography
    Positionality
    Preservation
    Processing
    Queer Theory
    Race
    Sexuality
    Socialism
    Tongzhi
    Websites


Proudly powered by Weebly
✕